Friday, June 17, 2011

long elegant prom dresses

images elegant-evening-dresses long elegant prom dresses. long elegant prom dresses.
  • long elegant prom dresses.



  • ca_immigrant
    03-25 04:39 PM
    the one from vamsi has gone up to 116 now...

    vote for a question folks....ask your friends also to vote..

    does not hurt to try our luck...





    wallpaper long elegant prom dresses. long elegant prom dresses. Long Elegant Prom Dress by
  • Long Elegant Prom Dress by



  • ndialani
    11-21 04:31 AM
    Experts, which is a better location for TCN H1 stamping? Nogales or Ciudad Juarez.

    I plan to visit one of these for H1 stamping. Any guidelines you can provide would be very helpful.

    Also, I am getting Nogales at 8 AM but I also need to get a check made from Banamex. Is there a BANAMEX in US that makes the visa check?

    Thanks.

    I live in LA , my wife and me drove from LA to Nogales. You can fly into Phoenix and rent a car. Phoenix to Nogales is 1.5 hours only.
    We stayed at Best western , which is RIGHT at the border. (Nogales,Arizona).It is owned my an Indian, he was very helpful. Most of the people end up staying there. Dont bring your car to other side. We call the cab at 7 in the morning. I guess he only charged like $7-8 dollars. Its only 1 mile.
    You just walk across the border. No questions asked. Get a cab, they all know it!!!!
    i guess we paid $10-12 dollars . He will take you to BANAMAX bank which is walking distance from the US embassy. Try to be the first one. They only accept CASH(Dollars).;
    Get the draft and walk back there. you will be required to show your passport at the bank too.
    If you are in a group or couple of you. One can stand in the line and other can to to the bank.
    Sprint phone works well over there at the border.
    If you have an I phone.....o'well!!!
    If your case is straight forward....it should not be a problem. They will tell you , to pick up your stamped passport in the evening, or if not ready ...the next day. But dont worry....99.9% everyone gets it the same day.
    If by any chance you get rejected. you can plee to homeland security office at the border . if your visa is not expired , they might let you slip back in to US. If not, you will have to go to Mexico City to fly back to India. I only know , one such case.
    KEY IS TO GO AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE. MAY BE 6:00am.
    We did not take any permit or visa as it is within 20 mile distance.
    On over way back , we got a new I-94 at homeland security office. It is very important.
    any questions....feel free to PM me.
    Good Luck!!!





    long elegant prom dresses. Elegant Long Dress, Clothing,
  • Elegant Long Dress, Clothing,



  • Blog Feeds
    09-18 10:20 AM
    AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:


    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_BVX2dyjOs1A/SqrbL7L6PQI/AAAAAAAAAB4/yCfhJ8gJpAQ/s320/Wilson+Liar.jpg (http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_BVX2dyjOs1A/SqrbL7L6PQI/AAAAAAAAAB4/yCfhJ8gJpAQ/s1600-h/Wilson+Liar.jpg)During President Obama's address to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday, Congressman Joe Wilson (R. SC), shouted "LIAR!" when President Obama stated that the proposed health care plan would not cover "illegal aliens." Now, Joe Wilson said he should know this because he once was an immigration lawyer (http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2009/09/rep-joe-wilson-speaks-to-rwv.html). Whether that meant immigration from or to South Carolina, I am not sure, but one thing is for sure, no one I know ever knew Joe Wilson the immigration lawyer. If by "immigration lawyer" Mr. Wilson meant that he once helped an immigrant get deported, I am not sure that really counts. But if "Joe the Immigration Lawyer" is like "Joe the Plumber," then maybe he thinks he really was one.

    After all, an immigration lawyer would likely be able to understand what exactly the law means when it says that only citizens and permanent residents are covered under the Obama plan. What has caused Joe Wilson to react like this, besides a serious lack of self control, is the provision in the proposed legislation that eliminates the requirement of using the "SAVE" system to verify whether someone who is an immigrant, is legally in the United States. Use of this program has stopped very few undocumented immigrants from getting public benefits, but has stopped literally thousands of U.S. citizens, mostly poor, from obtaining benefits because of their lack of accessible proof of their citizenship.

    Factcheck.org has presented a short article on Seven Falsehoods About Health Care (http://www.factcheck.org/2009/08/seven-falsehoods-about-health-care/). One of those applies directly to this point:

    False: Illegal Immigrants Will Be Covered. One Republican congressman issued
    a press release claiming that "5,600,000 Illegal Aliens May Be Covered Under Obamacare (http://steveking.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Newsroom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=a294b300-19b9-b4b1-1296-659af869849a&Region_id=&Issue_id=)," and we�ve been peppered with queries about similar claims. They�re not true. In fact, the House bill (the only bill to be formally introduced in its entirety) specifically says that no federal money would be spent on giving illegal immigrants health coverage:

    H.R. 3200: Sec 246 � NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS. Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States.

    Also, under current law, those in the country illegally don�t qualify for federal health programs. Of interest: About half of illegal immigrants have health insurance now, according to the nonpartisan Pew Hispanic Center, which says those who lack insurance do so principally because their employers don�t offer it."Misleading GOP Health Care Claims" (http://factcheck.org/2009/07/misleading-gop-health-care-claims/) July 23 � by Brooks Jackson, Viveca Novak, Lori Robertson and Jess Henig.


    I can certainly see both sides of the debate, and, frankly, neither side is being completely honest or clear. What is quite clear, is how immigration, and our broken immigration system, keeps coming up in the context of the debate of national agenda items, such as the health care debate.



    Several weeks ago I blogged on the danger that the tone of the Health care debate (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/08/healthcare-debate-and-immigration.html)had for the coming immigration reform debate. Calling the President a Liar during his speech to a joint session to Congress is Exhibit A in what we have in store for the coming debate. If Joe Wilson the Immigration Lawyer can misrepresent the consequences of legislative language as straight forward as these two particular sections, we have to be prepared for the extraordinary misrepresentations of any positive aspects of an immigration reform bill. Whether it is "amnesty," "rewarding law breakers," "open borders," "Liars," or even "destroyers of American culture" we have to understand how to phrase and present the response. Without a doubt, the response from those of us who understand the need to balance immigration reform, with security concerns, and with economic growth has to be not only vocal, but focused. We, as Real Immigration Lawyers, must know the language of the proposed legislation, we must know the myths that are out there, and we need to be vocal in our response.




    Next week, more than 40 talk radio hosts are descending on Capital Hill for the FAIR (http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=846)Annual Scare the Crap Out of Congress Boondoggle. The outrageous claims of the downfall of America caused by illegal immigration, along with similarly nutty myths will be presented as facts. Actual real news organization will cite the Center for Immigration Studies as a legitimate source of information. We must be prepared to call into our local radio stations, whose hosts are in D.C. next week, and be prepared to present the facts of immigration. Not by sugar coating the problems that are caused by illegal immigration, but rather by pointing out which specific laws are broken (INA 212(a)(9) anyone?) and how having a comprehensive solution can actually fix the immigration pothole in the legislative superhighway. Immigration Lawyers it is time to Stand Up and be vocal and beat back the immigration myths (http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?bc=27924).





    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-8070452709764975137?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com


    More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/09/liar-what-does-health-care-have-to-do.html)





    2011 Long Elegant Prom Dress by long elegant prom dresses. elegant prom dresses - black
  • elegant prom dresses - black



  • seahawks
    07-26 08:42 AM
    I was able to find this phrase, please check the context from the link provided.

    "Where the beneficiary has been counted against the quota during the past six years, and never been out of the US for more than one year during the past six years, a petition is exempt."

    http://www.hooyou.com/news/news060906h1b.html



    more...


    long elegant prom dresses. La Femme 12158 Prom Dress
  • La Femme 12158 Prom Dress



  • anilsal
    01-07 10:42 AM
    So it is really an administrator goof-up?





    long elegant prom dresses. long-prom-dresses
  • long-prom-dresses



  • MannyD
    10-25 01:19 PM
    should be valid preferably until you get your new I140 approved.

    Wanted to seek clarification: When you say "valid" do you mean past employer doesn't withdraw the 140 petition / substitute the LC? Or does 140 have a "valid till" date?

    And I note that someone mentioned we can go for any EB category in the new company. Can we also port the PD for any other job profile or should the job profile (as in approved LC/140) be matching in the new job?

    Thanks!



    more...


    long elegant prom dresses. Black prom dresses, fresh long
  • Black prom dresses, fresh long



  • vasired
    08-15 03:14 PM
    485 RD:6/29
    485 ND:7/25
    FP ND: 8/8
    FP Date:9/4





    2010 Elegant Long Dress, Clothing, long elegant prom dresses. elegant-evening-dresses
  • elegant-evening-dresses



  • silpa_23
    05-19 06:08 PM
    Greetings,

    In brief, I have applied for I-485 when I was single and now priority dates are current. I need to add my spouse. Do I need to apply for I-485 for myself again? Below are the timelines.

    Thanks in advance.

    In August 2006.
    1. Employer A
    2. I was Single.
    3. Files I-140 and I-485 concurrently.
    4. Schedule A expired.
    5. Application moved to Eb3.

    In June 2007
    1.Employer B (Moved in June 2007 via H1b transfer).

    Married in 2008.

    April 2010.
    1. Employer B.
    2. New I-140 filed in EB2, approved.
    3. Ported EB3 PD of Aug 2006.

    May 2011.
    1. PD will be current in June 2011.
    2. I need apply I-485 for my spouse.

    Do I need to re-apply for I-485 and G-235a for the principal applicant.



    more...


    long elegant prom dresses. This elegant dress for prom
  • This elegant dress for prom



  • ChainReaction
    04-02 02:28 PM
    I had filed for my 6th year h1b extension without the lawyer , I did so bec the paper work was similar to my last extension ,and i saw that lots of people on the IV forum had Filed the H1b extension themselves.

    Anyways, my human resource personal hired a new secretory and she some how misplaced my H1b receipt/possible RFE? , I have the EAC # from my cancel check ; when i check my status online it says case received and pending my PD is Jan08 ,2007 and the CSC is processing Jan. 13th, my question is if a RFE is issued will that be posted on the online case status website? I have asked the HR to request a duplicate copy from INS , should i also ask them to contact USCIS over the phone in addition to the written request?





    hair elegant prom dresses - black long elegant prom dresses. Elegant Fuchsia Prom Dress
  • Elegant Fuchsia Prom Dress



  • yestogc
    07-02 09:11 PM
    If your original H1B has expired and extension has been denied then you cannot work until MTR is approved.

    It is not stated anywhere how much time someone gets after his petition is denied, but you can take it anywhere between 30-45 days.

    Do you have EAD ?



    more...


    long elegant prom dresses. prom dresses for girls
  • prom dresses for girls



  • ujjvalkoul
    06-30 05:10 PM
    IT is a shady practice, if you file for a completely different person, file a new application. How come you can jump the line.?





    hot La Femme 12158 Prom Dress long elegant prom dresses. Prom dress 2011 long; elegant
  • Prom dress 2011 long; elegant



  • calaway42
    10-04 12:19 AM
    ok! well let me go try your steps .. wish me a luck :)



    more...


    house elegant long prom dress 2010 long elegant prom dresses. Tags: prom dress, elegant
  • Tags: prom dress, elegant



  • digital2k
    08-06 12:35 PM
    *





    tattoo long-prom-dresses long elegant prom dresses. Long red prom dresses with
  • Long red prom dresses with



  • rb_248
    01-08 02:46 PM
    I read on www.immigration-law.com

    01/08/2009: Bill Introduced in the House for Comprehensive Immigration Reform

    Rep> Sheila Jackson-Lee of Texas introduced H.R.264 yesterday to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to comprehensively reform immigration law, and for other purposes. For the full text of the bill, please stay tuned.

    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d111:8:./temp/~bdW24V::|/bss/111search.html

    H.R.264

    Title: To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to comprehensively reform immigration law, and for other purposes.

    Sponsor: Rep Jackson-Lee, Sheila [TX-18] (introduced 1/7/2009) Cosponsors (None)
    Latest Major Action: 1/7/2009 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Homeland Security, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    Text:
    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.264:

    I don't think they will act on this until the economic issues are resolved.



    more...


    pictures Black prom dresses, fresh long long elegant prom dresses. long elegant prom dresses
  • long elegant prom dresses



  • webm
    04-08 11:54 AM
    webm: what is the status of your application ( 485), is your NC, SC or fingurprints all clear. Did you speak to any IO about any update on your case as your PD is current ( 01 Oct).

    No i didn't speak to any IO..but FP cleared means the one we go for fingure printing isn't it??

    My PD is not current yet..just missed with one day lag..

    Cutoff date Oct'01 means they can/will only process apps whose PD's falls On/before Sep31st..





    dresses Prom dress 2011 long; elegant long elegant prom dresses. Style Dress Long Elegant
  • Style Dress Long Elegant



  • trueguy
    04-28 12:04 PM
    No issues for me when I came back on H1B on 4/20/2009.

    I had a H1B stamped on my passport from my previous employer and I was carrying new H1B approval notice from my current employer. I got I-94 till the validity of my new H1B approval from my current employer.

    No issues whatsoever, no question asked and it was smooth sail.



    more...


    makeup This elegant dress for prom long elegant prom dresses. elegant long prom dress 2010
  • elegant long prom dress 2010



  • doubleyou
    05-18 01:22 PM
    Congressional Reply says that the applicant is pending completion of background check. Previous congressional reply was that the name check is completed.

    AILA is not getting any response from USCIS as per the lawyer.

    How to check on the status of background check.





    girlfriend Long red prom dresses with long elegant prom dresses. Labels: 2008 Prom Dresses,
  • Labels: 2008 Prom Dresses,



  • h1bemployee
    06-23 06:29 PM
    On what basis will you apply for a H-1 transfer, your present H-1 request has been denied. Even If you apply for a MTR you have pending status, based on which you cannot request for a further extension/change of status. You can apply for a new H-1 consular processing petition, leave the country, once approved, apply for a visa from the consulate and come back on the new H-1.

    As my H1 transfer got denied.... I can apply for a new H1 transfer.... right?

    I am assuming this from the information I got form this forum. I am really confused..





    hairstyles prom dresses for girls long elegant prom dresses. 2010 Exotic Elegant Strapless
  • 2010 Exotic Elegant Strapless



  • h1bmajdoor
    07-08 10:14 PM
    India govt will not involve in USA internal matters.Idea was floated long back by few members and core team responded to it.

    this is BS.

    The interests of indian citizens resident in the USA (all decent taxpayers) are not being taken care of by the US political system. There is a clear pattern of exploitation by employers and neglect by CIS, FBI and others.

    In this situation, the interests of Indian citizens should be taken up by the Indian parliament. If they want to shy away from their duty, it should be taken up by the UN.





    GreenCardLegion
    03-25 06:36 PM
    My case details below:
    EB3 INDIA
    PD of Jul 2004.
    I am still working for same GC sponsoring employer since last 5 years. I still perform the same job title/job duties as mentioned in labor.
    My employer had mentioned a salary of 87,000$ in my labor.
    My 485 was filed way back in Sep 2004.
    My 140 was approved way back in Nov 2004.
    I have had 2 FPs done and 1 RFE replied to about 2 years ago. RFE was for EVL & TB Skin test.

    2004 W2 – shows 74,000$/yr (Less than the salary mentioned in approved labor which is 87,000$)
    2005 W2 – shows 57,000$/yr
    2006 W2 – shows 50,000$/yr
    2007 W2 – shows 58,000$/yr
    2008 W2 – shows 67,000$/yr

    Never changed employers nor job titles.

    My concerns and questions below:

    Q1) Will my 485 approval be affected due to the W2’s as mentioned above showing less way less salary than mentioned in the labor. I still work for same employer with same job duties/title as mentioned in labor.

    Q2) Am I safe because GC is intended for future job offer? If there is any issue with me getting less salary all these years than my labor petition then can my employer say the 87,000$/yr salary is after 485 approval? Will this suffice? Or am I in jeopardy here?

    Q3) With my EB3-India Jul 2004 PD how much more long do you think I need to wait to see a 485 approval? My FBI name checks are cleared.

    Q4) With June 2004 PD/EB3 India do you advise me at this stage after 5 years to switch to CP?

    Q5) Would you advise me to start a brand new EB2 India labor and 140 considering my retrogressed eb3 India category and dates?

    Q6) I have been on bench for about 3 times (periods of 2 to 3 months) in the last several years witout pay. But I have always had EAD but never used EAD as I had H1B from same GC sponsoring employer. But I always got paid every year more than the prevailing LCA wage for my geographical location? Will this affect my GC?

    Thanks.





    DareYouFireMe
    03-15 12:25 PM
    No

    As per my attorney, the provision of using I-140 date is for an individual. Employer's revocation has no impact.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment