Sunday, June 26, 2011

mohanlal wallpapers

images Mohanlal mohanlal wallpapers. One of Mohanlal#39;s biggest hits
  • One of Mohanlal#39;s biggest hits



  • Nikith77
    03-12 08:57 AM
    Why is this info no in the USCIS web site.





    wallpaper One of Mohanlal#39;s biggest hits mohanlal wallpapers. Universal Star Mohanlal.
  • Universal Star Mohanlal.



  • abhijitp
    07-24 12:07 PM
    I'll do it first thing as soon as I receive.
    Somebody was saying CIS will reject before issuing RN.
    Is that possible?

    We will get the RN most likely after August 17, so can we send another document pertaining to our already submitted AOS?

    I am trying to determine if it is worthwhile submitting a fresh I-485 along with this letter (and is there any risk at all with it). Suggestions welcome.





    mohanlal wallpapers. Mohanlal Wallpapers,
  • Mohanlal Wallpapers,



  • crazyghoda
    01-30 01:14 PM
    What I am not understanding is - why are they even looking at my case now? There are 4 years of applicants ahead of me, why cant the USCIS process those applications first?

    I have a sickening feeling that this is going to become more and more common in this economic situation. There must a push from above to reduce the backlogs and if they cannot approve the cases they are going to find a way to deny them on some pretext or other.





    2011 Universal Star Mohanlal. mohanlal wallpapers. Casanova Mohanlal Wallpapers
  • Casanova Mohanlal Wallpapers



  • forever_waiting
    02-16 04:03 PM
    Completely understand.
    On a related note, as pappu pointed out on another thread, it would be really nice if senior members, in general, who have got GCs in the past years continue to stay involved since their past advocacy experience is greatly valuable. Several such senior members have continued to stay involved but some have taken a back seat after "getting greened". Ideally, it should be the opposite - shouldnt getting a GC inspire us to be further involved in the process and get the issue resolved?

    I see and agree with what you say. I sponsored myself the last 2 times I went for advocacy days but this time the situation is different - I've got my green card already and therefore finding it difficult to justify the expenses to my wife.



    more...


    mohanlal wallpapers. alibhai-mohanlal
  • alibhai-mohanlal



  • nc14
    01-17 03:48 PM
    Just signed up for $20 monthly Recurring. Thanks a lot guys for doing what you have done so far and plan to do in the future. GOD Bless IV and its efforts.





    mohanlal wallpapers. Mohanlal#39;s eagerly awaited
  • Mohanlal#39;s eagerly awaited



  • Jerrome
    07-28 03:49 PM
    Good one..

    I am reading about 16th century stuff here in this thread.

    Let us go back to 10,000 B.C or further back (ice age or if possible even before).

    Was there any gods (known to us) then (any religion for that matter)?

    Gods came in to existence with human civilization. Initially as an answer to all things that were 'unknown' to human beings and then later as a 'tool' to insist discipline (in their own understanding as to what discipline is) among human beings.

    We talk about Iran, Iraq, afghanistan wars, bomb blasts in India, poverty in places like somalia and in all of these INCIDENTS millions of innocents died/die. What are/were the 'Gods' doing? Can They not stop this from happening?
    They won't. Because these are started by human beings and unless we stop it won't stop. Now don't direct me to a book or a PDF. Answer me straight.

    Human beings are the most cruel/selfish creatures on earth. We are animals - well worse than them - social animals. This thread does not make any sense.

    We are talking about our 'beliefs' here and that is decided by so many factors. Million people will have million different beliefs.



    more...


    mohanlal wallpapers. Mohanlal
  • Mohanlal



  • willwin
    03-17 03:12 PM
    Right. But here USCIS plays its villain role. What happens is USCIS moves clock ahead depending upon last month's "demand." We always think stramline logic.. USCIS does not work that way. It will kick PD to x date for an example Dec 2002. Now at the same time it will keep RD at say for example july 2001..Now it will keep some files eating dust in Name check so end effect is "Some" will get their gC. So next month, seeing this "demand" USCIS will kick PD further.. same game.. I believe at some level it decides seeing it reaching to "3500" limit put a break. So in reality what happen is even though USCIS kicks PD ahead not "all applicants with valid PD" get their GC. If they are unlucky enough to stuck in name check or RD is not being current, they will again wait for years for next kicking cycle start from April 2001.

    But when that happens, I guess, guys in CP wil get their interview scheduled (as long as their PD is current; no RD date concept there) as the queue in CP is not as long. Correct?





    2010 Mohanlal Wallpapers, mohanlal wallpapers. Mohanlal
  • Mohanlal



  • gimme_GC2006
    05-15 10:01 AM
    Any Idea about the following MBA Distance Leaning Courses from India

    1.SCDL-Symbiosis center for distance learning
    2.IGNOU - ndira Gandhi National Open University
    3.ICFA
    4.NMIMS - Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies

    Or any other institutes from India with reasonable fee structure.

    jD, I dont think desi unversities went online yet..but if you are here, why dont you think of doing an American or European MBA? ;)



    more...


    mohanlal wallpapers. Mohanlal Photos,wallpapers
  • Mohanlal Photos,wallpapers



  • nixstor
    03-18 05:17 PM
    I can use some help if I am missing some things here.

    Snip from 202 a 5 (http://www.uscis.gov/propub/template.htm?view=document&doc_action=sethitdoc&doc_hit=1&doc_searchcontext=jump&s_context=jump&s_action=newSearch&s_method=applyFilter&s_fieldSearch=nxthomecollectionid|SLB&s_fieldSearch=foliodestination|act202a&s_type=all&hash=0-0-0-1435)

    (A) EMPLOYMENT-BASED IMMIGRANTS NOT SUBJECT TO PER COUNTRY LIMITATION IF ADDITIONAL VISAS AVAILABLE- If the total number of visas available under paragraph (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) of section 203(b) for a calendar quarter exceeds the number of qualified immigrants who may otherwise be issued such visas, the visas made available under that paragraph shall be issued without regard to the numerical limitation under paragraph (2) of this subsection during the remainder of the calendar quarter.

    Paragraph in the above corresond to each category. So paragraph 1 is EB1. Paragraph 2 is EB2 and so on. So the translation is what the VB exactly said.

    What does 203 (b) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 say?

    Define EB1-EB5 categories. Find it here (http://www.uscis.gov/propub/DocView/slbid/1/2/15?hilite=).

    I posted the same Q on Ron Gotcher's forum this afternoon and my post did not go through to be moderated (I got the message that the post was submitted and will be posted after moderator approves it) or the mod chose not to post it.





    hair Casanova Mohanlal Wallpapers mohanlal wallpapers. Kavya is Mohanlal#39;s heroine in
  • Kavya is Mohanlal#39;s heroine in



  • angelfire76
    02-13 09:28 PM
    Dude you pay taxes for all the facilities that you are enjoying in this country.... nothing is free here.

    We are not eligible for unemployment, Medicare, Social security benefits, in-state tuition (have to verify this), Federal student aid and many more available to GC holders and US Citizens. As far as infrastructure is concerned, it's minimal at best with little to no public transport in most cities (unlike Europe). As IRS doesn't distinguish between citizens and non-citizens we pay the same amount of taxes, but see very little benefit from them.
    Can you update your profile or are you one of those FB guys who troll here to give us crap? :rolleyes:



    more...


    mohanlal wallpapers. Mohanlal Wallpapers 0110
  • Mohanlal Wallpapers 0110



  • yabadaba
    09-10 11:44 AM
    Perfect Weather For Marching

    80 High 61 Low Sunny 10% Chance Of Showers





    hot alibhai-mohanlal mohanlal wallpapers. Mohanlal Movie #39;Ivide Swargam
  • Mohanlal Movie #39;Ivide Swargam



  • desi3933
    02-12 04:04 PM
    Good to see your post. :) Your posts are very helpful and educational to IV members Thank you.

    If someone thinks visas are being wasted please send us the proof and IV will take action.



    Thanks Pappu.

    Appreciate your kind words.


    .



    more...


    house Mohanlal#39;s Shikaar Movie mohanlal wallpapers. UniversalStar Mohanlal, our
  • UniversalStar Mohanlal, our



  • chanduv23
    09-12 11:08 AM
    http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/sep2007/db20070911_591357.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index _businessweek+exclusives

    Everyone must come to the rally





    tattoo Mohanlal#39;s eagerly awaited mohanlal wallpapers. Sagar Alias Jacky(SAJ)
  • Sagar Alias Jacky(SAJ)



  • pkak
    07-13 11:45 AM
    They have no reason to pull the dates back. Most 2004, 2005, part 2006 people got to apply during the july07 fiasco. In the past, they have pulled the dates back if new applications flooded in when they pushed the dates up.
    USCIS will process in the following order now
    1. Pull out cases based on PD, review then approve/deny/RFE
    2. While waiting for RFE, process the next based on PD
    3. IF the RFE response window is outside of this fiscal, they will re-allocate the visa number to another approvable case.

    They will manage to process about 20k cases approving as many as possible by Sep30th2008.

    Therefore, only those with pending RFEs will be delayed into next year.

    USCIS is not all that inefficient or incompetent, not sure about DOS (to be fair, the Visa Office seems to have got its act together in the recent months)


    Where the visa numbers in Oct'08 will be will depend on how proactive IV is.

    Here is my take on the situation.

    DOS said that they used up 80% of EB numbers in first 3 quarters of Fiscal year '08, that leaves 28K (20% of 140K) visas available for last quarter of Fiscal year '08.

    Since higher priority categories are already current, this means that most of these visas have to be used by EB2 India/China.

    Hence DOS made it an option for USCIS to issue another 25K visas to EB2 India/China.

    See my analysis:

    I agree

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by justAnotherFile
    i believe the argument that this sudden jump was made to help eb2 china is pure hogwash.


    Scanning the FLC database, 5978 Indian Labor applicants with Level III/IV wage rates benefit with this jump, vs 761 Labor applicants from China.

    Assuming one labor approval generates 2.5 AOS applications, and dividing the total AOS applications by 2 (attrition, I-140 denials, EB3 cases etc), approx 15K Indians benefit, vs <2K people from China.

    Add to this 04/01/2004-03/27/2005 Indian applicants whose labor cases were adjudicated by Backlog Centers (approx 6000 Level III/IV applications , assuming same ball-park as 5853 similar India applicants certified in Fiscal year 2006), approx 7.5K more Indian�s will benefit.)

    If USCIS uses these 25K visas, then in Oct'08, they get the first quarter allocation for Fiscal year '09, and my calculation shows that EB2 India/China will move to atleast Jul 1, 06 (based on 627 India/China Level III/IV labor approvals forthat period).

    If USCIS lets the 25K visas to go waste, then in Oct'08, PDs will move back to mid 04.



    more...


    pictures Mohanlal mohanlal wallpapers. Mohanlal Photos,wallpapers
  • Mohanlal Photos,wallpapers



  • svr_76
    06-10 01:15 PM
    Our best bet is to partner with groups/org (hi-tech lobby) that have as members big firms that are impacted by this. This would give us a more directed approach on opposing.

    I am trying to identify the group of immigrants impacted by this rule-making and was trying to highlight that the rule restricts DHS from approving visa petitions from Employers.

    As such EADs are not filed by employers and moreover are not Visa application.





    dresses Mohanlal Movie #39;Ivide Swargam mohanlal wallpapers. Mohanlal Wallpapers. Download
  • Mohanlal Wallpapers. Download



  • Legal_In_A_Limbo
    03-07 11:27 AM
    In my husband's case we dont have that much time.

    Here what our plan is:-
    1. Self file G-28.
    2. Follow up with an infopass appt. with in a month.

    Rest god willing. What ever is going to happen will happen. No one can stop it from happening.



    more...


    makeup Mohanlal Photos,wallpapers mohanlal wallpapers. Mohanlal#39;s Shikaar Movie
  • Mohanlal#39;s Shikaar Movie



  • deepakjain
    06-08 06:12 PM
    The rate at which USCIS is denying H1B, L1 Extensions it seems people who in In process for.

    PERM
    140
    485 might have to wait for sometime in the following manner.

    EB 2- PD 2001 - Wait till 2012
    EB 2- PD 2002 - Wait till 2015
    EB 2- PD 2003 - Wait till 2017
    EB 2- PD 2004 - Wait till 2020
    EB 2- PD 2005 - Wait till 2023
    EB 2- PD 2006 - Wait till 2026
    EB 2- PD 2007 - Wait till 2028
    EB 2- PD 2008 - Wait till 2031


    EB 3- PD 2001 - Wait till 2015
    EB 3- PD 2002 - Wait till 2019
    EB 3- PD 2003 - Wait till 2024
    EB 3- PD 2004 - Wait till 2028
    EB 3- PD 2005 - Wait till 2032
    EB 3- PD 2006 - Wait till 2036
    EB 3- PD 2007 - Wait till 2040
    EB 3- PD 2008 - Wait till 2044....not sure how many will be alive to receive their GC...anway it is worth a wait....

    I have a 12 yr old ...and mine is EB3 - 2007 ...I think my son who will be 43 by 2040 will get me perm residency.....





    girlfriend Sagar Alias Jacky(SAJ) mohanlal wallpapers. Mohanlal#39;sSagar Alias Jackie
  • Mohanlal#39;sSagar Alias Jackie



  • waitforevergc
    02-14 10:02 AM
    this is an irrelavant thread. pls delete this thread.
    'ethnic cleansing' is a strong word and shouldnt be used in our context.
    thanks.





    hairstyles Mohanlal Wallpapers 0110 mohanlal wallpapers. Mohanlal wallpapers
  • Mohanlal wallpapers



  • prinive
    04-07 05:09 PM
    Thanks.

    It is NSC.

    First of all Congrats!!

    BTW,what is your 485 RD and processing center??





    va_dude
    05-26 04:32 PM
    carrying your gc is understandable, its just a card like your license.

    But expecting folks to carry their immigration papers all the time, even when they haven't travelled abroad is a bit too much. As long as i have my license or state id with me, it should suffice.

    This is just a classic case of harassing immigrants.





    ajay
    04-13 10:12 AM
    A very useful piece of information has been brought to our attention by shiankuraaf.
    Thank you very much!

    http://www.dhs.gov/ximgtn/statistics/publications/LPR08.shtm

    Table 6 Persons Obtaining Legal Permanent Resident Status by Type and Major Class of Admission: Fiscal Years 1999 to 2008

    http://www.dhs.gov/ximgtn/statistics/publications/YrBk04Im.shtm
    Table 4 Immigrants admitted by type and selected class of admission: fiscal years 1986-2004

    Employment-based preferences (Total Number)

    Year QUOTA ISSUED Unused/Excessively used
    1986 140000 56617 83383
    1987 140000 57519 82481
    1988 140000 58727 81273
    1989 140000 57741 82259
    1990 140000 58192 81808
    1991 140000 59525 80475
    1992 140000 116198 23802
    1993 140000 147012 -7012
    1994 140000 123291 16709
    1995 140000 85336 54664
    1996 140000 117499 22501
    1997 140000 90607 49393
    1998 140000 77517 62483
    1999 140000 56678 83322
    2000 140000 106642 33358
    2001 140000 178702 -38702
    2002 140000 173814 -33814
    2003 140000 81727 58273
    2004 140000 155330 -15330
    2005 140000 246877 -106877
    2006 140000 159081 -19081
    2007 140000 162176 -22176
    2008 140000 166511 -26511

    Sum total of the differences from 1986 to 2008: 626,681. Vow!!!

    So when looked between the period of 1986 and 2008,
    there were a total of 626,681 un-used visa numbers that can be re-captured.

    This is based on the BIG assumption that the yearly quota for EB categories is 140,000 from 1986 to 2008.
    Does anybody know how to verify this important assumption online --a link to a gov website perhaps?

    It would be good to verify when the law specifying 140,000 visa numbers per year was passed and
    what were the criteria for visa number usage prior to the existence of the law.
    It is clearly a well prepared format and nobody has brought this kind of helpful information to our group. We would need people like you and I am sure I will also support this if we are aggressively pursuing it. But again as somebody here said in this discussion that we should be careful about the seriousness of the situation being counted by the lawmakers.
    Kudos to you.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment